Skip to main content

Kam's Counter-Usrah Movement. a.k.a. C.U.M. ("Hardly-fantastic-attempt-to-conceal" Innuendo)

1. The objective is to allow one to be spiritual in their own way. We believe in the philosophy that every individual is different and is free to pursue his own way to God. Faith is essential and is unmeasure-able by any human standards, except God's. This is for deviant non-conformists to conventional approach to cultivation of spirituality called "usrah".

2. The modus operandi is for the individual to contemplate his own relationship with God. i.e. it starts off with meditating on "What do I understand about God ?" and "How do I relate to Him ?" and "Do I really believe for certain in a God ?" and "If I do believe, am I certain that I love Him ?" and "what comes next after that ? " This modus operandi is the anti-thesis of the typical usrah where their mantra has always been "you fake it until you make it." Their pedagogy lies in the lack of faith in its own members to contemplate spirituality. i.e. they have no capacity within themselves to think about theology, they rely on a religious figure to tell them things regarding fiqh. Critical thinking is not allowed. You only obey. What's more important to you is empty ritual and getting a soleh spouse, only when you have fully accustomed with the ways of the usrah and attain recognition and favor of the head of your piety due to conforming to the uniformity of line of thinking with the rest of the pack, then do you not only have the authority to comment on religious issues, but only then do you have the capacity to think of more "philosophically-heavy" issues of "What is God ?" and "Why do I serve Him ?" At the noob level, the correct answer would be "because I don't want to be thrown into hell fire" (and I don't want to be ditched by the group).

3. Emphasis is placed on individual effort. There is no need for a master-disciple relationship nor a friendship-till-jannah obligation amongst members, nor any need to regularly meet to enforce ties between members to the point that one feels obligated to serve and be one of the pack every time.

4. Discussions may be of any topic. Who knows, maybe one can find contemplation of tawheed from unexpected things, say, of reggae songs.

5. There is no need for progress check. One's own progress is of one's own responsibility and is between oneself and one's God.

6. There is no importance nor necessity of discussions in trying to get more members into the group, nor of efforts of trying to get members to stay. There shall be no "branding" on members, asking them to follow one line of thinking and calling for base-less slacktivism like changing your Facebook profile picture to show solidarity, or seasonal boycotts.

7. There shall be no tolerance for bigotry, nor speeches of hell fires and brim stones.

8. Remember, this counter-usrah is not intended to turn out into just another usrah, so there is no need for any effort of forming an organisational structure. We're anarchists like that. There is no need for regular sessions. This is merely an alternative approach in cultivating spirituality, based on individualistic methods rather than via an organized movement known as "usrah". and if you think running a country is like running a nationwide "usrah", well, think again.

9. Feel free to disagree. What works for you, may not necessarily works for others. Diversity is encouraged. We celebrate differences. Critical thinking is encouraged, and respect is paramount.

10. Lastly, have faith in faith.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kiddies

Okay, yesterday, I went to my little sister's kindergarten sports day held at SMK Seksyen 5, Wangsa Maju Hall. Well, the field is wet because it has been raining almost every day in KL, well, in my area. Anyway, I was the photographer that day, a tak bertauliah one, mind you. Here are some of the pics. They are so cute! bacaan ikar This is not a running in a sack event, this is a running sack balloon haul bean bag race future Rahman formation? Well, I guess that's about that.

My Fair Lady

This is an old issue, I know. What has brought my attention to the topic of women rights was when I watched one of the episodes of Commander In Chief on Hallmark. In that series, the president of the United States was supposedly a woman. Interesting, and she plans to take the stand for women rights to the next level despite the controversies arousing her brave statement. The debate was whether or not it was relevant to debate on an old issue, in respect of the state of today's society. Women of today have a better status than they did way back in the days of history old. Women emancipation has been heatedly debated especially in the West throughout the time, and perhaps, the most memorable one was of the Suffragettes, fighting for the right of women to vote. Some places in Africa, in history, do not even recognize rape of women, as a crime, however, all of that has changed, thankfully. The question now is, are women actually 'emancipated' as we are all made to belief? well,...

Outta..Control!

Sometimes in life, we have to laugh ourselves silly..laughing at ourselves! Life must go on and there will always be more room for improvement. So, for my last post before I go back to school, I'm gonna put my debating pictures, then and now.. just for fun see how much I've evolved from the 4-minute emo speech to the 8-minute still emo speech, haha. however, I haven't any pictures on my public speaking though, so I don't know how I fared. One judge commented me last year that I was as stiff as a robot! so, here we go! THEN UIA 2007- against RMC, yep, this is the one I'm talking about! The most embarrassing debate, aww, my first time.. look at Mirul, covering his face in shame, Kak Ainul, praying kot? and at the back at that time, Teacher Rozy was having a good laugh with Amirul Irfan, RMC's researve at that time. okay..this went out of hand! what the hell was I doing?? These pictures are really old ones that reside in my thumbdrive that I have yet to upload.haha...